Emma Thorpe
3f50577de6
Build and publish container / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
--dry-run described a FAT32 rename as an encode. process() skipped the rename whenever dry_run was set, then found no file at the target and fell through to the encode path, so a preview of enabling --fat32-safe announced a full re-encode of every track whose name held a reserved character. The real run moves those files in a moment. A preview that inverts the cost of the thing being previewed is worse than no preview at all. Prune compounded it. With nothing renamed, the pre-sanitisation files are still on disk, and they were reported as orphans due for deletion -- so the same dry run claimed the library would be re-encoded and the originals thrown away, neither of which is true. Renames are now their own outcome: reported as "would rename" in a dry run, counted separately from encodes in the pass summary, and excluded from the orphan list when a dry run leaves them in place.